Evaluating the Longevity and Quality of Classic Sneaker Brands

[Leo]

I've been reflecting on the lasting power of classic sneaker brands and their products, especially those with a heritage in American manufacturing. I'm particularly interested in how contemporary offerings compare in terms of durability and comfort to their vintage counterparts. Given that New Balance, which owns PF Flyers, has a reputation for quality, does anyone have insights on whether their 'Made in USA' sneakers truly outlast the standard models? Furthermore, I'm curious about the community's opinion on whether the legal disputes between brands like Converse and PF Flyers have impacted consumer loyalty or perceptions of the brand. With Converse's 70s line offering discounts and free returns, I'm torn between supporting tradition and seeking more cost-effective options. Are there any other sneaker enthusiasts who weigh the historical significance and ethical considerations of a sneaker brand when making a purchase?

[Leo35]

Tough choice! The heritage aspect really speaks volumes.

[MarkRocks]

Loyal to the 'Made in USA' ethos, and it shows in wear-and-tear.

[Ryan87]

I'm sorry to hear about the issues with PF Flyers and the legal disputes. It can be frustrating when these things impact our choices as consumers. I hope they sort things out soon!